Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 150 Vt. 483 - State v. Hunt

State v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
4
states following
February 2020
most recently cited

59 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably State v. Whitaker (1990), Ball v. Melsur Corp. (1993)

59 state decisions

29019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Mendenhall · Doyle v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A defendant cannot have it both ways. If he talks, what he says or omits is to be judged on its merits or demerits, and not on some artificial standard that only the part that helps him can be later referred to. This was not a case where the government commented upon a prior exercise of rights. The government asked the jury to measure what the defendant said when he had no rights because he had voluntarily waived them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he prosecutor did not penalize defendant for exercising his Fifth Amendment rights; he never asserted those rights. Once a defendant decides to speak, his failure to speak in exculpation cannot be explained away as a response to Miranda warnings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “where defendant has chosen not to remain silent, the prosecutor may comment to the jury, and use for impeachment, inferences from the statements which he made of his own volition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.