State v. Swenson’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 120 Wash. 2d 585 - State v. Greenwood · 87 Wash. 2d 870 - State v. Striker · 90 Wash. 2d 423 - State v. Peterson · 107 Wash. 2d 59 - State v. Pacheco · 121 Wash. 2d 852 - State v. Anderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hether Swenson waived his objection to the arraignment date turns on whether the state acted with good faith and due diligence. If there was no good faith and due diligence, Swenson's time for trial deadline expired on January 26, 2000, and his objection was proper.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Swenson“Swenson never provided the trial court with information on when he believes he should have been available for transport.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Swenson“confident that the State has demonstrated good faith and diligent effort to locate and obtain the Defendant for trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Swenson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.