Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 150 Wis. 2d 256 - State v. LeQue

150 Wis. 2d 256 - State v. LeQue’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 117 Wis. 2d 701 - State v. Woods · 95 Wis. 2d 173 - Mulder v. Acme-Cleveland Corp. · 42 Wis. 2d 368 - State Ex Rel. Kurkierewicz v. Cannon · 104 Wis. 2d 247 - State v. Drogsvold · 84 Wis. 2d 435 - State Ex Rel. Herget v. Circuit Court for Waukesha County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “subject to adult circuit court jurisdiction because the age of the defendant on the date the action is filed, not his age on the date of the alleged offense, determines whether the adult court has subject matter jurisdiction over a criminal proceeding.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “adult circuit court [had] the authority to determine all criminal actions [and t]his authority [was] circumscribed only by the juvenile court's jurisdiction and it is well established that this restriction only exists if the defendant is under the age of eighteen when charged [under the statute then applicable, §§48.12(1) and 48.02(3m), STATS., 1987-88)].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “If a child is alleged to have violated s. 940.01 or 940.02 [first-degree intentional and reckless homicide] on or after his or her 14th birthday or if a child is alleged to have violated any state criminal law on or after his or her 16th birthday, the child or district attorney may apply to the court to waive its jurisdiction under this chapter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.