¶1Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude from our review of the record that the suppression court correctly found that the pretrial photographic identification procedures used by the police were not impermissibly suggestive (see, Simmons v United States, 390 US 377, 384-386). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — rape, first degree.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Boomer and Lawton, JJ.
151 A.D.2d 1017
People v. Essig
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 2, 1989
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1989-06-02
Decided 1989-06-02