¶1Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Where, as here, each claimant filed a document within the statutory period prescribed in Court of Claims Act § 10 and the document embodied all of the necessary elements of a claim (Court of Claims Act § 11), the Court of Claims properly determined that each document constituted a valid, timely filed claim against the State (see, Chalmers & Son v State of New York, 271 App Div 699, affd 297 NY 690; Carnesi v State of New York, 140 AD2d 912, 913; Jacobs v State of New York, 129 AD2d 772; Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. State of New York, 121 AD2d 694; Heisler v State of New York, 78 AD2d 767). (Appeal from order of Court of Claims, NeMoyer, J.— discovery.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
151 A.D.2d 991
Kelly v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 2, 1989
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1989-06-02
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1992
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1989-06-02
View the full empirical analysis of this case →