¶1The indictment was in Code form. Under the indictment a sale made in violation of a local law could be shown. — Section 5077, Cr. Code 1896; Olmstead v. State, 89 Ala. 16, 7 South. 775; Ulmer v. State, 61 Ala. 208; Sills v. State, 76 Ala. 92.
¶2The demurrer to the indictment was properly overruled. This being the only question presented on the record, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
¶3Affirmed.