Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 Ariz. 192 - State v. Fallon

State v. Fallon’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
August 2003
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2003

14 state decisions

60198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Sweet · State v. Fallon · State v. Schroeder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, if a person is convicted of any class 6 felony not involving the intentional or knowing infliction of serious physical injury or the use of a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument and if the court, having regard to the nature and circumstances of the crime and to the history and character of the defendant, is of the opinion that it would be unduly harsh to sentence the defendant for a felony, the court may enter judgment of conviction for a class 1 misdemeanor and make disposition accordingly*”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The underlying principle of Sweet and Fallon is that, prior to the 1984 amendment to A.R.S. § 13-702(H), the trial court could not legally defer the designation of an open end offense pending the outcome of probation. Thus, the subsequent designation, as occurred in both Sweet and Fallon , was a nullity. It was this attempt to breathe felonious life into an improper sentence that is condemned in Sweet and Fallon , not which enhancement statute was being utilized. 5”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The [undesignated] offense shall be treated as a felony for all purposes until such time as the court may actually enter an order designating the offense a misdemeanor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.