Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 CALAPP2D 369 - Wilson v. J. Bramblett

Wilson v. J. Bramblett’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
June 1962
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 65 Cal. App. 486 - Silva v. Gordo · 73 Cal. App. 68 - Allen's Collection Agency v. Lee · Harper v. French · 108 Cal. App. 7 - Peterson v. Matchinske · 138 Cal. App. 2d 1 - Rogers v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Many of the several defenses made by respondents and found by the court as to why the note was unenforceable against these defendants appear to be tenable. Without discussing them, we conclude that respondents’ liability on the original note and copy thereof sued upon was conditional, depending upon the signature of Bramblett or ratification by the individuals signing and was not duly executed and delivered, within the meaning of that term. This conclusion is sufficiently supported by the evidence and the law even though appellant retained a copy of the note. It therefore becomes unnecessary to determine the other claimed defenses.” (Emphasis supplied.) 311 P.2d at 25 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * It has been definitely held that where a note is given under an agreement that it is not to become binding until signed by another person, the failure to obtain said additional signature precludes a recovery as between the original parties or transferees who have notice of the agreement, unless the obtaining of the additional signature is wrongfully prevented by the maker. (Citing cases.)” 311 P.2d at 25 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.