151 Cal. App. 4th 37 - In Re Paul W.’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
31 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 46 Cal. 2d 818 - People v. Watson · Lassiter v. Department of Social Services of Durham County North Carolina · 23 Cal. 3d 412 - People v. Pope · 33 Cal. 3d 572 - People v. Fosselman · 5 Cal. 4th 242 - Cynthia D. v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`Where the interests of two parties interweave, either party has standing to litigate issues that have a[n] impact upon the related interests.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“isat besta `remote consequence of the ruling' that `does not satisfy' the requirements for standing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“lacks standing to raise issues affecting another person's interests.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.