State v. Traub’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 4 district · 49 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently June 2011 · most notably 62 Cal. 2d 757 - People v. Bilderbach (1965), State v. Derrico (1980)
9 federal appellate · 4 district · 49 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Ker v. State of California · People v. Mickelson · 59 Cal. 2d 713 - People v. Haven
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`have been an operative factor in causing or bringing about the confession.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Eserjose · State v. Carlow““In other words, where, as we are assuming for the purposes of this opinion, a detention is illegal, a confession made during such a detention cannot be admitted unless and until the State proves that (1) the confession was truly voluntary, and (2) it was not caused or brought about by, or the fruit of, the illegal detention. It is the second, or causation factor, which Wong Sun added to the voluntariness requirement. If the detention is illegal, then it must be eliminated as an operative factor. If the detention is legal, the causative factor is immaterial if the first requirement of voluntariness is satisfied.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Moore“an act of free will to purge the primary taint of the unlawful invasion,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.