Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

151 F. 497

Docket No. 97.

W. & J. Sloane v. Dobson

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1907.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1907-01-07

<p>Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for1 the Southern. District of New York.</p>

2 counsel of record

Relies on Sloane v. Dobson

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1907-01-07

¶1Patents—Infringement—Fastener for Stair Carpets.

¶2The Adams patent, No. 587,633, for a fastener for stair carpets, claim 1, Is void for anticipation. Claim 2 held not infringed.

¶3Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for1 the Southern. District of New York.

¶4For opinion below, see 145 Fed. 352.

¶5E. R. Newell, for appellant.

¶6Chas. E. Brock, Frederick S. Stitt, and Grafton L. McGill, for appellees.

¶7Before WALLACE, LACOMBE, and TOWNSEND, Circuit Judges.

¶8PER CURIAM.

¶9The first claim in suit is limited to a single bar having a toothed edge. This construction is anticipated by the patent to Penrose. The second claim comprises “brackets or bars secured at intervals, … and tooth bars or plates secured thereto,” etc. These brackets or bars are described and shown as attached to and forming an essential part of the fastener. We are not satisfied that the construction covered by this claim did not involve invention, but it is clear that it is not infringed by defendants' fastener, which consists merely of two separate slotted plates, having toothed edges having no such brackets or bars, and no connecting: attachments of any kind.

¶10The decree is affirmed, with costs.

/151/f1d/497 · .json · Public domain