Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 F.2d 183 - Thomas v. United States

Thomas v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

151 F.2d 183 · 1945

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
June 1972
most recently cited

12 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 1972

12 federal appellate ·

401945195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bruno v. United States · Weiler v. United States · McCandless v. United States · Bird v. United States · Little v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well settled that appellant had a right to a correct statement of the law from the court. It is of course the duty of the court to explain the law of the case to the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.