Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

151 F.2d 602

Docket No. 10033.

Teramine v. Shuttleworth

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 17, 1945.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1945-10-17

2 counsel of record

Relies on Tippitt v. Squier

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1945-10-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 2016

3 federal appellate ·

2019451950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1James V. Bellanca and Donald F. Welday, both of Detroit, Mich., for appellant.

¶2John C. Lehr, U. S. Atty., and Vincent Fordell, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Detroit, Mich., for appellee.

¶3Before ALLEN and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and FORD, District Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel ;

¶6And it appearing that the appellant is in confinement at the Federal Correctional Institution at Milan, Michigan, by virtue of a valid sentence of imprisonment in a penitentiary for the term of two years beginning on the date on which he was received at the penitentiary for service of such sentence;

¶7And it appearing that this sentence, imposed May 25, 1942, was to run consecutively with a previous sentence imposed November 20, 1934:

¶8And it appearing that the sentence under the prior conviction was not fully executed until November 9, 1944:

¶9It is ordered that the order dismissing the petition for writ of habeas corpus be, and it hereby is, affirmed. Cf. Tippit v. Squier, 9 Cir., 145 F.2d 211.

/151/f2d/602 · .json · Public domain