Randolph v. Calamas

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 23, 1945.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1945-10-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1949

1 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1945-10-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Paul T. Chance, of Augusta, Ga., for appellants.

¶2W. Inman Curry, of Augusta, Ga., for appellees.

¶3Before SIBLEY, HUTCHESON, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5In the trial of this suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., the Judge sitting without a jury found that as to two of the appellants no evidence was submitted to show the number of hours per week worked by them. As to the third, he found that the evidence was in conflict and did not persuade him that this appellant had worked more hours than he had been paid for. We find the evidence to warrant these fact conclusions which, not being clearly erroneous, are to-be affirmed by this Court under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

¶6Judgment affirmed.