In re Magasis

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Nov. 9, 1945.

Decided Nov. 15, 1945.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1945-11-15

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States ex rel. Samuels v. Pearson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1945-11-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1983

2 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Meyer Kreeger, of New York City (George M. Eichler, of Jersey City, N. J., on the brief), for appellants.

¶2Grover C. Richman, Jr., of Camden, N. J. (Edgar H. Rossbach, U. S. Atty., of Newark, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.

¶3Before MARIS, GOODRICH, and O’CONNELL, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5In these three cases the district court denied the petitioners’ applications for writs of habeas corpus. The applications allege facts similar to those disclosed in the case of United States ex rel. Samuels v. Pearson, Post Commanding Officer, Fort Dix, New Jersey, 3 Cir., 151 F.2d 801. For the reasons given in our opinion in that case it is clear that the facts alleged in these applications entitle the petitioners to the issuance of writs and hearings thereon.

¶6Accordingly in each case the order of the district court is reversed and the cause is remanded to that court with directions to award a writ of habeas corpus as prayed for.