In re Sandow’s Empirical Analysis
151 F.2d 807 · 1945
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Cox v. Lansdowne (1990), Lansdowne v. Cox (1994)
19 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. Henderson · White v. Schoenfeld · Hedges v. Bushnell · In re Muss · Stanley's Inc. Store No. 3 v. Neiderheiser
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[he] did not comprehend the need for them and must carry [his] explanation by way of justification to the point where it reasonably appears that because of unusual circumstances [he] was under no duty to keep them.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The statute puts the burden squarely upon the bankrupt who produces no financial records to produce at least a satisfactory explanation of their absence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The initial burden lies with the creditor to show that the debtor failed to keep and preserve any books or records from which the debtor's financial condition or business transactions might be ascertained.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.