Anyanwutaku v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
151 F.3d 1053 · 1998
Citation profile
42 federal appellate · 80 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 166 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Max Lopez Jr v. Ga Smith Larry Loo a Acevedo Patterson 4a-2r (2000), Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence Agency (2004)
42 federal appellate · 80 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Estelle v. Gamble · Haines v. Kerner · Heck v. Humphrey · Neitzke v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 166 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A Rule 59(e) motion is discretionary and need not be granted unless the district court finds that there is an intervening change of controlling law, the availability of new evidence, or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“only when, if successful, it would 'necessarily imply,' or automatically result in, a speedier release from prison.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“rendered moot his claims for ... prospective injunctive relief.... His damages claims, however, remain properly before us.”); Scott v. District of Columbia, 139 F.3d 940 , 941 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 851 , 119 S.Ct. 125 , 142 L.Ed.2d 101 (1998) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Qassim v. Bush · Qassim v. Bush
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.