Vannatta v. Keisling’s Empirical Analysis
151 F.3d 1215 · 1998
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Anita Lerman Angelo D'Angelo v. Board of Elections in the City of New York (2000), Clinton A. Krislov v. Wanda L. Rednour (2000)
11 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Buckley v. Valeo · Anderson v. Celebrezze · Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp. · Carrington v. Rash · Shaw v. Reno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the State demonstrates a sufficiently important interest and employs means closely drawn to avoid unnecessary abridgment of associational freedoms.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“We have consistently held that restrictions on contributions require less compelling justification than restrictions on independent spending”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“restrictions on contributions . . . are subjected to less exacting scrutiny than restrictions on independent expenditures”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.