Shaw v. Prentice Hall Computer Publishing, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
151 F.3d 640 · 1998
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2019
8 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 213
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Corning Glass Works v. Brennan · Batterton v. Francis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“clearly he is doing work directly related to management policies or general business operations.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“advising the management, planning, negotiating, representing the company, purchasing, promoting sales, and business research and control.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is not limited to persons who participate in the formulation of management policies or in the operation of the business as a whole,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.