In Re Jaritz Industries, Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis
151 F.3d 93 · 1998
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably United States v. Government of the Virgin Islands (2004), Jonathan Lazorko Patricia Norlie Patricia Norlie-Lazorko (2000)
8 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · Robinson v. Shell Oil Co. · Willy v. Coastal Corp. · International Primate Protection League v. Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in their historic, technical sense. But literalness is no sure touchstone of legislative purpose. The purpose here is more closely approximated, we believe, by giving the historic phrase a looser, more liberal meaning in the special context of this legislation. 23 342 U.S. at 242-43 . 24 In Jaritz, we concluded that the analysis undertaken in Juneau Spruce applied with equal force: 25 Although the term”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“any reason Congress might have wished to garner the efficiencies provided by [section 155] for judicial districts having an Article III district court and not for judicial districts having an Article IV district court which exercises the jurisdiction of an Article III by virtue of the legislation that created it.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Did it use the term in a generic sense to refer to the geographic area in which a district court exercises judicial authority in bankruptcy matters, or did it intend its scope to be limited to the geographic area in which an Article III district court exercises judicial authority over such matters.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.