United States v. Aronowitz’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (§ 242 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553
Relies on United States v. Booker · Blakely v. Washington · Stinson v. United States · United States v. Davis · United States v. Brennan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In a case involving a scheme in which [ ] services were fraudulently rendered to the victim by persons falsely posing as licensed professionals ... loss shall include the amount paid for the ... services ... transferred, rendered, or misrepresented, with no credit for the value of those ... services.” Our Court of Appeals, in a nonprecedential opinion, has acknowledged that Amendment 617”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.