United States v. Tush’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Teague v. Lane · Bailey v. United States · Bousley v. United States · Davis v. United States · Katzenbach v. McClung
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny such impediment was not created by `governmental action in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.