151 F. Supp. 2d 836 - Sallier v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E
Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · William Marbury v. James Madison · Perrin v. United States · Bill Martin Director Michigan Department of Correctionss v. Everett Hadix · Burns v. Alcala
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“hours spent defending the jury award, against the defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law, may also be considered hours spent to `make certain' the verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Riley v. Kurtz“the fee was directly and reasonably incurred in proving an actual violation of the plaintiff's rights....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Riley v. Kurtz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.