Aranki v. Burwell’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 42 U.S.C. § 1395 (§ 1801 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395Y (§ 1862 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Aetna Life Ins Co of Hartford Conn v. Haworth · Wilton v. Seven Falls Co. · Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of America · United States v. Lee · Cardinal Chemical Company v. Morton International Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“) account. 42 C.F.R. § 411 . The purpose of a MSA is to allocate a portion of a workers' compensation award to pay potential future medical expenses resulting from the work-related injury so that Medicare does not have to pay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“CMS mandates the creation of a Medicare "set aside”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.