151 Ill. App. 3d 1000 - People v. Jamerson’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1987
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 113 Ill. 2d 497 - People v. Bryant · 25 Ill. App. 3d 644 - People v. St. Pierre · 44 Ill. App. 3d 922 - People v. Plum
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[I]f we were to. reverse and remand the instant case for a trial de novo, the second paragraph of the circumstantial evidence instruction (IPI Criminal No. 3.02) would not be given at the new trial in accordance with Bryant. We believe that it would be absurd to reverse a case due to an alleged error regarding the jury instructions and remand the case for a new trial where the identical set of instructions would be given.” ( 151 Ill. App. 3d 1000, 1002 , 503 N.E. 2d 1124, 1125 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.