Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 IND 376 - Slayback v. Witt

Slayback v. Witt’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
4
states following
January 1966
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 1966

20 state decisions

8018981900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Allore v. Jewell · Barnard v. . Gantz · Cudney v. . Cudney · Teegarden v. Lewis · Ikerd v. Beavers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This duty most frequently arises where the relations between the parties are those of attorney and client; . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.