Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 IND 556 - Scott v. State ex rel. Gibbs

Scott v. State ex rel. Gibbs’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
4
states following
November 1989
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 1989

19 state decisions

601898190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Carson v. Harrison · Gosman v. State ex rel. Schumacher · State ex rel. Yancey v. Hyde · State ex rel. Jackson Township v. Berg · Smith v. Moore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is settled that all officers except members of the legislature hold their offices under the constitution for the term for which they are elected, and until their successors are elected and qualified. (authorities). “Under the constitution officers who are elected for a term, are thereby authorized to continue to hold and discharge the duties and receive the emoluments of their office until they are superseded by other persons in their places even though that extends beyond the legal length of the term for which they to ere elected, (authorities). “The policy of constitutional provisions of that nature is to prevent the happening of vacancies in office except by death, resignation, removal and the like. State, ex rel. v. Harrison, supra. As was said in the latter case at page 441: ‘It adds an additional contingent and defeasible term to the original fixed term, and excludes the possibility of a vacancy, . . . ’” (Italics supplied).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.