Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 KAN 924 - Toepffer v. Toepffer

Toepffer v. Toepffer’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
January 1991
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 1991

15 state decisions

50194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Seals v. Snow · Lantis v. Davidson · Watts v. Watts · Fourth National Bank v. Diver · Page v. Van Tuyl

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An adjudication of insanity creates a presumption of continuing insanity, but the presumption is a disputable one and may be rebutted by any competent evidence of a subsequent sound condition of mind at a particular time.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.