Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 KY 97 - Bryant v. Strunk

Bryant v. Strunk’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
December 1948
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 1948

4 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

801912192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While lines of a patent will be extended in order to reach a designated object, this will not be done where it is evident from all the facts that the surveyor simply made a mistake as to the location of the object; he supposing it to be at one place, when, in fact, it was at another.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.