Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 LA 497 - Maloney v. Schulingkamp

Maloney v. Schulingkamp’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1944
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““So far as we can see, his professional services were valuable and in conformity to what they should have been in the circumstances. Had he been allowed to complete the purposes of the employment, the fee claimed would, under all the evidence and circumstances of the case, have been fair and reasonable. Since he was not allowed to continue, through no fault of his own, and there only remained about one-fourth .of the work to be completed, we think the sum of $1,500 would be commensurate with the work performed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.