State v. Horton’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently January 1982 · most notably State v. Dallao (1937), State v. Curry (1972)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Heidelberg · State v. Satcher · State v. Sinigal · Covington v. Roberson · State v. Riggio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Except in extreme cases, the presumption is that the prejudicial effect on the jury of improper remarks made by counsel for the state was removed by the instructions of the court to the jury to disregard the same.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Poole
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.