Appeal from Wayne; Mandell, J.

Bill by Michael L. McCarron and Ellen H. McCarron against Frank D. Wheeler for an accounting. From á decree dismissing the bill, complainants appeal.

Complainants were once the owners of the lands involved in this suit. They were covered by mortgages amounting on March 1, 1898, to $3,674, which they were unable to pay. They applied to the defendant for assistance. Defendant let complainant Michael have the above amount. The mortgages were discharged and complainants conveyed the lands to the defendant by warranty deed. Defendant executed to complainants an agreement reciting the transaction and agreeing to reconvey the lands to complainants upon payment of the $3,674 in one year, with interest and taxes thereon at six per cent, per annum, interest payable semi-annually. The agreement further provided that if complainants were unable to pay said amount as provided, the lands were to be sold and the money over and above the contract price to be paid to complainants.

On August 1, 1898, complainants sold and by proper conveyance assigned all their right, title, and interest in said contract to one Larrabee for $475. Larrabee subsequently conveyed the same to one Dey, and Dey and his wife by the proper quitclaim deed conveyed all their right, title, and interest by virtue thereof to the defendant. All these instruments were seasonably recorded. Complainants thereafter paid no attention to the property, paid no interest or principal, and in September, 1899, removed to the State of Massachusetts to reside. On August 3, 1904, they filed the bill in this cause, claiming that the deeds from them to the defendant were mortgages. The bill alleges also prior money transactions between complainant Michael and the defendant; that they never had a settlement of these transactions; that there is a large amount due from defendant to the complainant Michael thereon, which is sufficient to pay the amount obtained from defendant on March 1, 1898. The previous transaction between the complainant Michael and defendant began in 1892. Mr. McCarron was a contractor. In order to obtain consideration of his bids he was obliged to deposit certified checks to evidence his good faith. Not having sufficient money of his own he obtained checks from the defendant to be used for that purpose. After these checks had served their purpose they were from time to time returned to the defendant, and Mr. McCarron received credit therefor. The most of these operations occurred in 1892 and 1893. There were two or three other subsequent transactions, all of which were prior to March 1, 1898.

…

Citation profile

How this case has been treated — in progress