Jones v. Pendleton’s Empirical Analysis
1908
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 1914
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on People ex rel. Gorman v. Judge of the Newaygo Circuit Court · Kleis v. Niagara Fire Insurance · Wingert v. Carpenter · Loranger v. Davidson · Connecticut Fire Insurance v. Kinne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ It is also said that one cannot, by amendment, introduce a new cause of action. * * * Here the plaintiff has but one cause of action. He failed to properly describe it. The question here is whether the court has power to permit plaintiff to amend his declaration so that he may recover on the precise cause of action for which he brought suit, but which he failed to properly describe in his declaration. We think it is clear that he has that power.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. Pendleton““ Under our previous decisions in this case, the cause of action stated in the proposed amended declaration is a different cause of action from that stated in the original declaration-, and if at the time of Judge Mandell’s order the statute of limitations had run against the cause of action, he did not err in refusing to allow the amendment, and his order must be sustained.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. Pendleton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.