State v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1959
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Wilson · State v. Wassing · State v. Briggs · State v. Evans · State v. Gray
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Every person who, by means of three-card monte, so called, or of any other form or device, sleight of hand, or other means, by use of cards or instruments of like character, or by any other instrument, trick,' or device, obtains from another person any money or other property of any description, shall be deemed guilty of the crime of swindling.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Yurkiewicz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.