Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 MISC2D 1051 - People v. Singleton

People v. Singleton’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] review of the legislative history reveals that the problem the Legislature most had in 'mind when they enacted [ N.Y. Pub. Health § 3383 ”, rendering it “unlawful for any person to manufacture, sell or possess with the intent to sell, an imitation controlled substance,”] was a proscription of the sale of substances which re sembled otherwise legitimate substances, i.e.,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.