Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 N.C. 123 - Lawrence v. . Hardy

Lawrence v. . Hardy’s Empirical Analysis

1909

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2017

5 state decisions

20190919101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Our law is properly solicitous of the rights of such a purchaser; and, while they are affected by the existence of certain defects apparent in the record, numerous and well-considered decisions with us sustain the position that only those defects which are jurisdictional in their nature are available as against his title.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “at any time within one year after notice thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.