Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 N.C. 676 - State v. . Spivey

State v. . Spivey’s Empirical Analysis

1909

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
June 1990
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1990 · most notably Roberts v. Louisiana (1976), State v. Duboise (1971)

26 state decisions

801909191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““After a careful review of the decisions of this Court, and a critical examination of the statute (Revisal, sections 3631 and 3271) [now G.S. 14-17], we deduce the following doctrine: Where the evidence tends to prove that a murder was done, and that it was done by means of poison, lying in wait, imprisonment, starving, torture, or which has been committed in perpetration or attempt to perpetrate any arson, rape, robbery, burglary or other felony, and where there is no evidence and where no inference can fairly be deduced from the evidence of or tending to prove a murder in the second degree or manslaughter, the trial judge should instruct the jury that it is their duty to render a verdict of ‘guilty of murder in the first degree,’ if they are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt, or of ‘not guilty.’ ...” 151 N.C. at 685-86 , 65 S.E. at 999 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “either guilty of murder in the first degree or not guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.