151 N.C. App. 185 - State v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
25 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Chimel v. California · Mincey v. Arizona · Jones v. United States · Steagald v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he Fourth Amendment grants individuals the right to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures. Generally, a warrant supported by probable cause is required before a search is considered reasonable. The warrant requirement is a principal protection against unreasonable intrusions into private dwellings. This requirement is subject only to a few specifically established and well delineated exceptions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Moreover, it is well settled that where the officers' search is conducted during the course of `legitimate emergency activities', they may seize evidence of a crime that is `in plain view'.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“had every right to enter the area secured by [the police officers] and remove evidence observed in plain view, which had been seized by the securing of the crime scene.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.