Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 N.C. App. 219 - State v. Wilson

151 N.C. App. 219 - State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co. · Houltin v. United States · State v. Wilson · Bailey v. State · 99 N.C. App. 153 - Von Ramm v. Von Ramm

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The writ of certiorari may be issued in appropriate circumstances by either appellate court to permit review of the judgments and orders of trial tribunals when [(1)] the right to prosecute an appeal has been lost by failure to take timely action, or [(2)] when no right of appeal from an interlocutory order exists, or [(3)] for review pursuant to G.S. 15A-1422(c)(3) of an order of the trial court denying a motion for appropriate relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]o prevent manifest injustice to a party, or to expedite decision in the public interest, either court of the appellate division may, except as otherwise expressly provided by these rules, suspend or vary the requirements or provisions of any of these rules in a case pending before it upon application of a party or upon its own initiative, and may order proceedings in accordance with its directions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.