151 N.C. App. 82 - Shaw v. Mintz’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2006
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Little v. Rose · Jones v. Satterfield Development Co. · Prentzas v. Prentzas · Ragan v. Hill · Murphy v. Glafenhein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Nothing in this section shall bar: (1) Any claim alleging the liability of the decedent to the extent that the decedent ... is protected by insurance coverage with respect to such claim ... or where there is un-derinsured or uninsured motorist coverage that might extend to such claim ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Simpson v. McConnell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.