Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 Neb. 717 - Hawk v. State

Hawk v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

8 district · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2023 · most notably Darr v. Burford (1950), State v. Lotter (2003)

8 district · 36 state decisions

170194919501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Ex Parte Hawk No - on Rule to Show Cause and Return · Hawk v. Olson · Williams v. Kaiser · Bute v. People of State of Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The common-law writ of error coram nobis is not a substitute for the statutory remedy of a writ of error under the Nebraska criminal procedure. * * * “The purpose of the writ of error coram nobis should be noted. The writ of error coram nobis is to enable the court to recall some adjudication, made while some fact existed which, if before the court, would have prevented rendition of the judgment, and which, through no fault of the party, was not presented. * * * “The common-law writ of error coram nobis to bring into the record facts which were unknown to the defendant at the time of trial through no lack of reasonable diligence on his part, which, if known at the time of the trial, would have resulted in a different judgment, exists in this state * *”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.