State v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
111 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 111 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably State v. Jacobs (2000), State v. Morton (1998)
111 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gregg v. Georgia · Furman v. Georgia · Wade v. Hunter · Adams v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 111 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[w]here a juror on voir dire fails to disclose potentially prejudicial material... a party may be regarded as having been denied a fair trial." [ Kozlov, supra, 79 N.J. at 239 , 398 A. 2d 882 [, 885].] The [ Kozlov ] Court explained that "[t]his is not necessarily because of any actual or provable prejudice to his case attributable to such juror, but rather because of his loss, by reason of that failure of disclosure, of the opportunity to have excused the juror by appropriate challenge, thus assuring with maximum possible certainty that he be judged fairly by an impartial jury." Ibid.; see also State v. Deatore, 70 N.J. 100, 105-08 , 358 A. 2d 163, 166-68 (1976). [ Scher, supra, 278 N.J.Super. at 264, 650 A. 2d at 1019 .]”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) The actor purposely causes death or serious bodily injury resulting in death; or (2) The actor knowingly causes death or serious bodily injury resulting in death.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] misrepresentation by police does not render a confession or waiver involuntary unless the misrepresentation actually induced the confession.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.