State v. Moe’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 1991
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Railway Employes' Department v. Hanson · Christianson v. United States · State v. Carroll · State v. Pusch · Killmer v. Duchscherer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We are of the opinion that for the purpose of impeachment the most reasonable practice, and the one generally prevailing, minimizing prejudice and distraction, is that beyond the name of the crime, the time and place of conviction, and the punishment, further details may not be inquired into. McCormick, Evidence § 43, at 92-93 (1954). * * *” State v. Moe, 151 N.W.2d 310, 320 (N.D.1967).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Kresel v. Giese · Dugas v. Felton““A witness may be impeached on cross-examination by inquiries as to collateral facts tending to incriminate, disgrace, or degrade him, and, where such an inquiry is as to previous conviction on account of a criminal offense, it is not confined to conviction for felony.” State v. Fury, 53 N.D. 333 , 205 N.W. 877 (1925).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kresel v. Giese“We have also said: “. . . the determination of whether evidence is too remote to be relevant is left to the discretion of the trial judge, and his decision will not be reversed in the absence of clear proof of an abuse of that discretion.” State v. Moe, 151 N.W.2d 310, 316 (N.D.1967).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Buckley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.