← 151 Ohio App. 3d 103 - State v. Siferd

151 Ohio App. 3d 103 - State v. Siferd’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

cited by 61 later decisions

states following

November 2022

most recently cited

57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably Giddins v. State (2006), 177 Ohio App. 3d 560 - State v. Robinson (2008)

57 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Jenks · State v. Bradley · State v. Long · State v. Barnes · Reves v. Ernst & Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“two or more incidents of corrupt activity, whether or not there has been a prior conviction, that are related to the affairs of the same enterprise, are not isolated, and are not so closely related to each other and connected in time and place that they constitute a single event.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Reyes, Unpublished Decision (4-29-2005) · State v. Lightner, 6-08-11 (2-9-2009)
“prove that each defendant was voluntarily connected to the pattern [of corrupt activity comprising the enterprise], and performed two or more acts in furtherance of it.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Boyd, Ot-06-034 (3-14-2008) · State v. Weiss, Unpublished Decision (4-19-2004)
“* * * any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, limited partnership, corporation, trust, union, government agency, or other legal entity, or any organization, association, or group of persons associated in fact although not a legal entity. `Enterprise' includes illicit as well as licit enterprises.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Boyd, Ot-06-034 (3-14-2008) · State v. Lightner, 6-08-11 (2-9-2009)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.