151 Ohio App. 3d 208 - State v. Desper’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 2021
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Whalen v. Roe · New York v. Burger · 86 Ohio App. 3d 37 - State v. Williams · Crystal Fergusons v. City of Charleston · 112 Ohio App. 3d 521 - State v. Hopfer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is the distinct function of the legislature to make laws and formulate public policy, and the function of the judiciary to interpret those laws.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Suppression is not the appropriate remedy for a nonconstitutional violation; rather, the appropriate remedy is the grant of a motion in limine.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.