Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 Ohio App. 3d 243 - State v. Chambers

151 Ohio App. 3d 243 - State v. Chambers’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · State v. Hayden · 50 Ohio App. 3d 56 - State v. Qualls · 210 Wis. 2d 502 - State Ex Rel. Vanderbeke v. Endicott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “including the opportunity of the defendant to be heard and present witnesses and the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses, 'may be rendered null if the defendant is not competent to understand and to participate in or to assist counsel in participating in the proceedings”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “was automatically classified as a sexually oriented offender and therefore must register with the sheriff of the county in which he resides as prescribed by R.C. 2950.04 (A)(2).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.