151 Ohio App. 3d 36 - State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
43 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently September 2022 · most notably 153 Ohio App. 3d 144 - State v. Purser (2003), Butler, Billy Dean (2015)
43 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Williams v. People of State of New York · State v. Adams · Gardner v. Florida · Specht v. Patterson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that he is likely to engage in the future in one or more sexually oriented offenses. In reviewing the facts of this matter, it is this court's opinion that the lower court had ample evidence to classify appellant as a sexual predator. Caldwell did plead guilty to multiple sexually oriented offenses involving multiple child victims. Thus, by statute, appellant is at least to be classified as a”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“{¶ 16} “In making a determination * * * as to whether an offender is a sexual predator, the judge shall consider all relevant factors, including, but not limited to, all of the following: {¶ 17} “(a) The offender’s age; {¶ 18} “(b) The offenders’s prior criminal record regarding all offenses, including, but not limited to, all sexual offenses; {¶ 19} “(c) The age of the victim of the sexually oriented offense for which sentence is to be imposed; {¶ 20} “(d) Whether the sexually oriented offense for which sentence is to be imposed involved multiple victims; {¶ 21} “(e) Whether the offender used drugs or alcohol to impair the victim of the sexually oriented offense or to prevent the victim from resisting; {¶ 22} “(f) If the offender previously has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to any criminal offense, whether the offender completed any sentence imposed for the prior offense and, if the prior offense or act was a sex offense or a sexually oriented offense, whether the offender participated in available programs for sexual offenders; {¶ 23} “(g) Any mental illness or mental disability of the offender; {¶ 24} “(h) The nature of the offender’s sexual conduct, sexual contact, or interaction in a sexual context with the victim of the sexually oriented offense and whether the sexual conduct * * * was part of a demonstrated pattern of abuse; {¶ 25} “(i) WTiether the offender, during the commission of the sexually oriented offense * * * displayed cruelty or made one or more threat”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The hurdle the proponent of the document must overcome in order to properly authenticate a document is not great. For instance, `with respect to a document attributed to the defendant, the prosecution need only provide a rational basis from which the jury could infer that the document did, in fact, belong to him.' {¶ 11}”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.