151 Ohio App. 3d 422 - State v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
21 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2256
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Williams v. People of State of New York · New York v. Ferber · Ashcroft Attorney General v. Free Speech Coalition · Wasman v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a presumption of vindictiveness. * * * In order to overcome the presumption, the trial court must make affirmative findings on the record regarding conduct or events that occurred or were discovered after the original sentencing.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“represents or depicts the person as a minor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.