Adams v. Small’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1962
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Wingate v. Render · Packard Oklahoma Motor Co. v. Funk · Oklahoma Union Ry. Co. v. Lynch · Wachtstetter v. Challinor · Calhoma Oil Syndicate v. Atlas Supply Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To constitute actionable fraud, it must be made to appear: (1). Tfyat defend- , ant made a material representation; . (2) that it was false;- (3)- that when, he made it he knew that it was false,- or made it recklessly, without any knowledge of its truth and as a positive assertion; (4) that he made it with the intention that it should be acted upon by plaintiff; (5) that plaintiff acted in reliance upon it; (6) that he thereby suffered injury; and (7) that all these facts must be proven with a reasonable degree of certainty, and all of them must be found to exist; the absence of any of them would be fatal to a recovery.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.