¶1On September 17, 1996, defendant’s probation was revoked for two violations of a restraining order and, in a separate order, for possession of a stolen vehicle. Defendant’s appeal is from the order revoking probation for violations of the restraining order only. On the merits of that appeal, we affirm. Although the parties also make arguments based on the order in a related case, that order is not before us.
¶2Affirmed.